It is common to hear that the best outcome for any child is to “fit in”. Current research and the lived experience of neurodivergent (ND) people show a different reality: Children thrive when they can be their authentic selves and receive responsive support.¹ Inclusion is not about making everyone the same. It is about ensuring every child can thrive without hiding who they are.”
Neurodiversity: Natural variation in how human brains think, feel, and process the world - “Neurological differences are to be recognised and respected as any other human variation.” (National Symposium on Neurodiversity ²)
Neurodivergent (ND):A term that describes someone whose brain differs from the majority (autism, ADHD, dyslexia, Tourette’s, etc.).
Neurotypical (NT):A term that describes someone whose brain aligns with the majority / dominant expectations.
Historically, the medical model framed disability as a deficit within the child to diagnose and cure³. Research evidence and ND voices show that, often, struggles arise from external barriers, e.g. when environments are noisy, inflexible, or shaming, children struggle; when barriers are reduced (e.g., visuals, movement breaks, sensory supports), participation improves. Thus, the environment is usually the barrier, not the child³.
The social model reframes this view: difference is natural, disability emergesand/or increases when environments and attitudes lack appropriate accommodations. Aiming to embrace this model does not deny challenges. It simply puts responsibility where it belongs, i.e., an individuals' beliefs, systems, and communities, so children do not carry the burden of “fixing” who they are³. The key question becomes "What accommodations will help this child thrive as themselves?"³.
Medical Model | Social / Neuro‑Affirmative Model |
---|---|
1. Fix the child → Normalise | Remove barriers → Value differences |
2. Compliance = Success | Authentic engagement = Success |
3. Behavioural approaches | Co‑regulation & agency, and understanding of underlying needs and authentic profiles |
4. One curriculum fits all | Flexible pathways & multiple ways to learn |
5. 'Tragedy' narrative / pity / condescendence | Rights, dignity & belonging |
Ableism: Seeing the System, Not the Child
Ableism is any belief or practice that devalues people whose bodies and/or brains differ from neurotypical societal norms, and can come through expectations, language, and policies, impacting significantly on equitable access. Ableist beliefs narrow opportunity, lower expectations, and pressure students to mask, suppressing intrinsic and adaptivebehaviours to appear NT. Masking is linked to poorer mental‑health outcomes, such as higher anxiety, depression, and burnout⁴.
Challenging Ableism - Steps You Can Implement
Action | Everyday Habits & Practical Examples |
---|---|
Mind Your Language
Positive Impact: The child feels respected and develops stronger self‑belief. | Call‑In Moments: Question ableist comments in conversations, chats, and social media.
|
Question Comparisons
Positive Impact: Greater willingness to tackle challenges and less self‑criticism |
|
Model Acceptance Positive Impact: Children mirror self‑acceptance and increased confidence and curiosity. Accommodations become neurotype appropriate, with fewer behaviour escalations and stronger sense of belonging |
|
Guard Against Masking Positive Impact: Fewer evening meltdowns and healthier self‑esteem and energy. |
|
Behaviour, Masking, and Mental Health: Key Notes
Behaviouris communication:It can mean “I’m okay,” “I’m curious,” “I’m overwhelmed,” or “I hurt,” particularly when a child can’t find the words.
Behaviour Label: What We Say | What Might Really Be Happening? | Impact |
---|---|---|
“Compliant / high functioning” | The child is suppressing sensory overload or anxiety to appear typical, i.e. masking, which is hiding or suppressing natural ND traits, e.g., stimming, making small conversation, making eye contact. | Sustained masking → higher anxiety, burnout, depression, suicidal ideation⁴. |
“Disruptive / challenging” | When a child’s senses or emotions are overloaded, the nervous system can trigger a bottom-up stress response, i.e. automatic, body-driven reactions like fight/flight/freeze. Research suggests about 70–80% of behaviours adults find challenging are these bottom-up responses, and only 20–30% are top-down (deliberate, planned) behaviours, even though adults often assume children are fully in control⁶. | Punishing the response intensifies distress & erodes trust⁶. |
“Lazy” | Executive‑function fatigue, i.e. working harder to plan and organise, can look like "lack of will" and/or “laziness”.⁷ | Ignoring fatigue can lead to burnout & lower self‑esteem⁷. |
Strength‑Based, Attuned Support: How can we support?
Focus Areas | Practical Examples |
---|---|
Safety & Connection Why It Matters: Regulation first ↔ learning second⁸. Positive Impact: Calmer transitions, fewer meltdowns, faster problem‑solving. |
|
Address Root Needs Why It Matters: Meeting sensory & predictability needs cuts anxiety & task avoidance⁹. Positive Impact: Increased engagement, longer on‑task time |
|
Teach Self‑Advocacy Why It Matters: Self‑advocacy skills predict higher life satisfaction & academic persistence¹⁰. Positive Impact: Child asks for help earlier, reduced masking, stronger self‑esteem |
|
Leverage Strengths Why It Matters: Strength‑based learning boosts intrinsic motivation¹¹. Positive Impact: Deeper focus, better quality work, pride in achievements. |
|
Parent Q&A
Question parents often ask… | Neuro‑affirmative response |
---|---|
“If my child does not learn to act ‘normal’, how will they ever fit into society?” | Masking raises anxiety, depression, and burnout; authentic participation plus accommodations, as and when needed, build belonging⁴. |
“Isn’t it my job to push my child to overcome their diagnosis?” | Neurotypes cannot be changed. Champion strengths and remove barriers; framing neurodivergence as a deficit undermines wellbeing¹⁶. |
“Won’t accommodations make my child dependent?” | Accommodations create access and boost engagement and confidence¹⁷. |
“What if my child falls behind academically because we focus on wellbeing and inclusion?” | Progress is only possible when sensory and emotional needs are met first, as a regulated and accepted child has more cognitive bandwidth to participate and engage across learning and friendships. Academic gains may follow when these foundations are in place, and they will look different for each learner¹⁵. |
Reference List
Hehir, T. & Katzman, L. (2012). Effective Inclusive Schools.
National Symposium on Neurodiversity (2011).
Oliver, M. (1990). Politics of Disablement; Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability Rights & Wrongs Revisited.
Livingston, L. et al. (2020); Cage, E. & Troxell‑Whitman, Z. (2019); Morris, R. et al. (2021).
Autistic Self Advocacy Network (2022). Guidelines for Inclusion.
Delahooke, M. (2019). Beyond Behaviors.
Barkley, R. (2015). Executive Functions.
Porges, S. & Dana, D. (2018). Clinical Applications of the Polyvagal Theory.
Dunn, W. (2001). Sensory Processing Framework.
Burke, M. et al. (2020). Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 50(2).
Prizant, B. (2015). Uniquely Human.
Brown, L. X. Z. (2021). We’re Not Broken.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset; Martin, A. (2014). Social Comparison & Anxiety.
Kinnear, S. et al. (2016). Autism, 20(6).
Hehir, T. (2016). Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 24(3).
Milton, D. (2022). “The Double Empathy Problem.”
Staniland, J. & Smith, T. (2013); Shattuck, P. et al. (2012).