We use cookies to improve your online experience. To learn more please refer to ourPrivacy Information Collection Statement.

Sorry but this form will not work without cookies enabled. Please adjust your browser settings to enable cookies to continue. For more information on how to do this please see our.

  • A Unique Approach

    We think beyond a traditional education to really transform the learning experience of your child.

    Primary Students

  • Be Ambitious Be Regents

    Opportunities beyond the ordinary to develop the skills and mind-set to thrive in a changing world.

    Year 12 Outdoor Education

  • A Happy and Rewarding Experience

    Regents can be far more than a school to come to every day – it can be a second home too.


  • Some of the Best in the World

    Highly qualified with the majority of teachers coming from the UK provide a personalised learning experience for your child.

    Environmental Science

  • We Educate Your Child for the Future

    Our engaging learning environments mean your child will love coming to school.

    STEAM Machine

  • Join Our Truly International and Diverse Community

    We look forward to welcoming you to our family.

    Students in the IT department | Regents International School Pattaya

  • Step Into Our World

    Unique opportunities that transform learning, instill life-long memories and a deep sense of achievement.

    Secondary English

  • Get in Touch

    We look forward to hearing from you.

    Early Primary Reading

Will history absolve Fidel Castro?

03 March 2014

The Year 12 History class recently held an excellent debate on the controversial question: ‘Will History Absolve Fidel Castro?’ As a unit in our IB Diploma History course, we have been learning about Castro’s Cuba and the debate was a great way of applying our knowledge and understanding, as well as testing our skills of analysis and evaluation.

  • Regents' students engage in a debate

The class was split into two groups, ‘for’ and ‘against’. I was the judge and it was my task to decide on the winning team by a simple point system: plus one for a good argument, nothing for a mediocre argument and minus one for a bad argument.  A good argument was classified as one which followed the PEE method (Point, Explanation, Evidence).

Each group presented three outstandingly powerful arguments. ‘For’ explained how he has greatly improved Women’s Rights, and how he has enhanced literacy and decreased mortality rates. As there are two sides to an argument, ‘against’ mentioned how Castro had promised to not become Communist. However, he did exactly that! They also explained how, despite the success of improving the rights of women and minorities, some social groups such as religious groups and homosexuals were being discriminated against. Counter-attacks from both groups were exceptional.

Jenny, Year 12 IB Diploma Student

This is an abridged version of an article which appeared in the latest (Term 2, Edition 3) Secondary School Newsletter.